<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Employers: Think Twice About Giving LinkedIn Recommendations to Employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nclawlife.com/2009/07/08/employers-think-twice-about-giving-linkedin-recommendations-to-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nclawlife.com/2009/07/08/employers-think-twice-about-giving-linkedin-recommendations-to-employees/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:54:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joker</title>
		<link>http://nclawlife.com/2009/07/08/employers-think-twice-about-giving-linkedin-recommendations-to-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Joker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawlife.com/?p=374#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Hello, 
nclawlife.com - da best. Keep it going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
nclawlife.com &#8211; da best. Keep it going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Hollick</title>
		<link>http://nclawlife.com/2009/07/08/employers-think-twice-about-giving-linkedin-recommendations-to-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Hollick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawlife.com/?p=374#comment-224</guid>
		<description>As a long-time user of LinkedIn I have to support your caution on the use of recommendations. The information has always been suspect to me anyway. On sites like Amazon it is relatively easy to be objective about a product. But on LinkedIn, recommendations are about people. We are writing about our friends and coworkers. It is much harder to be objective.

Further, it seems like more often than not, recommendations are a quid pro quo for a reciprocal recommendation. &quot;I&#039;ll scratch your back if you scratch mine&quot; is a great way to engage with the world but it doesn&#039;t lead to  objective evaluations.

Just my 2 ¢
Heather</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-time user of LinkedIn I have to support your caution on the use of recommendations. The information has always been suspect to me anyway. On sites like Amazon it is relatively easy to be objective about a product. But on LinkedIn, recommendations are about people. We are writing about our friends and coworkers. It is much harder to be objective.</p>
<p>Further, it seems like more often than not, recommendations are a quid pro quo for a reciprocal recommendation. &#8220;I&#8217;ll scratch your back if you scratch mine&#8221; is a great way to engage with the world but it doesn&#8217;t lead to  objective evaluations.</p>
<p>Just my 2 ¢<br />
Heather</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

