Work Made for Hire Agreements Save Time, Uncertainty and Money

By: Donna Ray Berkelhammer. This was posted Monday, October 8th, 2012

Rate how helpful this article is:
Not HelpfulSomewhat HelpfulPretty HelpfulVery HelpfulExtremely Helpful

(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

We often receive calls from clients who — way back when — hired web site designers, graphic artists, photographers, videographers or web site hosts, now want something updated, and received outlandish payment demands from the vendor to have “their” content modified. What is going on, and how can you avoid this scenario?

January 5th - FOR HIRE

(Photo credit: Mr.Tea)

Many business owners assume when they hire an outside source to produce content (logo, artwork, web site design, training video or materials, blogs, web site copy, photographs, web site domain name registration), the company owns the resulting work product because it paid to have the work custom-made. This is not true.

The US Copyright law in this area is arcane, counter-intuitive and not helpful.

While companies typically own the work product developed by their employees, only certain works specified in the Copyright Act are considered “works made for hire” that are owned by the hiring party, and only if the parties agree up front in writing that the work will be a “work made for hire”.

Section 101 of the Copyright Act defines a “work made for hire” as a work specially ordered or commissioned for use:

  • as a contribution to a collective work,
  • as a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work,
  • as a translation,
  • as a supplementary work,
  • as a compilation,
  • as an instructional text,
  • as a test,
  • as answer material for a test, or
  • as an atlas,

    but only if the parties expressly agree in a written instrument signed by them that the work shall be considered a work made for hire.

    This statute  sorely needs updating to be relevant to the current business environment and reasonable expectations of business owners.  In some instances, the company may have an implied license to use the work it commissioned, but the best practice is to use Work Made For Hire Agreements any time your company is commissioning creative work of any type.  These agreements clarify the ownership of the work product, and also what the specifications are, cost, payment terms, and recourse for improperly completed work or work that turns out not to be original.

    If you have questions, contact one of our business or intellectual property attorneys.

    Tags: , , , ,


    Comments:

    • designing special effects…

      [...]Work Made for Hire Agreements Save Time, Uncertainty and Money | North Carolina Law Life[...]…

      Posted by: designing special effects | November 1st, 2012 at 10:28 am
       
    • web design…

      [...]Work Made for Hire Agreements Save Time, Uncertainty and Money | North Carolina Law Life[...]…

      Posted by: web design | October 23rd, 2012 at 11:18 pm
       
    • Types of Lawyers…

      [...]Work Made for Hire Agreements Save Time, Uncertainty and Money | North Carolina Law Life[...]…

      Posted by: Types of Lawyers | October 8th, 2012 at 9:58 pm
       
    • Not only does this affect businesses hiring a freelance designer or photographers, it also affects agencies doing the same thing.

      If I work for a company as a designer, concept the photo that will be shot, am on location or at the studio with the photographer, direct him, look through the camera’s viewfinder (or screen in digital photographer), make changes to the composition, lighting, etc. until it is how I want it and pay him his fee, he still owns the resulting product unless a transfer of rights is agreed on.

      Not cool.

      Posted by: Chris Edwards | October 8th, 2012 at 1:03 pm
       

    Leave a Reply